Truth and Democracy

Dedicated to fact based opinion, real American values and the fight against Fascism right here in the United States of America. The author is currently working on his debut non-fiction novel, The Case FOR Two Americas: Why it may be time for Progressive America to Secede.

Name: Paul_NJ
Location: Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Fair and Balanced.....

Fair and Balanced....

Barack Obama seemed to reach across the political aisle in his 2004 speech to the democratic convention. Again in his 2008 presidential campaign, he extended a hand to those who disagree with him. Throughout his career he has made a point of articulating respect for conservative views. This behavior undoubtedly won him votes in unusual places for a democrat last year but I'm not sure he gained any practical political advantage in the process. If you've seen the kind of things the right are accusing him of now, you may have reached the same conclusion.

Despite Obama's sometimes congenial tone, the divide between right and left in this country remains as wide as ever. It even seems to be widening. The healthcare reform debate has put a microscope over the situation, crystallizing just how far apart we are. The month of August, 2009 has become an angry one indeed, with people all over America screaming at each other in town hall meetings. What mature adult Americans actually believe that other Americans are trying to force upon them is unsettling, at least, and downright frightening in reality. At such a town hall "listening" (ironic word) event I met two somewhat rational looking grownups who had used an obviously dying pen to scrape something about "Obama's Death Squads" into a piece of foam board. If this is what we've come to, then where do we go from here?

For their part, the right seems to see an agenda on the left which includes slavery to pure communism, euthanasia, taking all their guns away, taxing them until they have nothing left, banishing the practice of religion and otherwise depriving them of any personal liberty. Probably surrendering to all our enemies too. They call it "evil". Knowing the left as well as I do, this seems like extreme paranoia. There are a couple of way out radicals I've met who might like one or two of these ideas but to see this as the motivation behind the entire democratic party is a stretch of monumental proportions.

Observing their paranoia, I must also assess my own beliefs about the right. I see an "evil" agenda within the GOP as well. An agenda which seeks to eliminate the constitution and institute a theocratic government based on christian fundamentalism, install a fundamental christian version of sharia law, make the government responsive only to the rich and powerful, allow large corporations to operate with no concern for individuals or public safety and return us to a socio-economic scenario not unlike the late 19th and early 20th centuries where most people work hard for next to nothing with no legal rights while a few wealthy families reap the windfall. In my more "fair and balanced" moments I have to consider the possibility that most republicans don't support this agenda either.

So, where from here? Good question. Our ever proliferating news media is not about to bridge the gap. Even as the left plays catch-up in the "opinion as news" arena, we are still only likely to believe the voices that tell us what we want to hear anyway. The internet news boom offers only more partisanship and an awful lot of disinformation to boot. I don't have the answer and I'm not altogether sure there is one. There's nothing wrong, of course, with an ongoing robust debate between right and left as to the future of America. It just seems like that debate would be more constructive if both sides saw a little less hidden agenda and trusted each other a bit more.

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Four years later.....

What a difference a few years can make! This blog has been dormant for a very long time. I've just now rediscovered it. I haven't been writing much in the interim and it will probably show. Reviewing the material here it strikes me that while I occasionally struck gold and even showed some prescience, for the most part I was just blowing off steam (anger at the right).

The political landscape has altered since then in ways I didn't dare dream. In '06 the democrats took back control of congress and two years later America elected an African-American president while giving him an historic legislative majority. Barack Obama redrew the electoral map in '08, increased the number of so-called "purple" states and probably solidified some new "blue" states in the process. I would be remiss here if I didn't acknowledge the inspiration and contributions to this political sea-change made by the former governor of Vermont, Howard Dean. Kudos, you screamin' genius!

The radical right hasn't been this powerless in the political arena since the mid 1970's. Of course, they recovered pretty quickly back then. You might even say with a vengeance. Remember Ronnie Reagan anyone? I'm sure you do. As I write this, right wing forces are gearing up to bring down president Obama and sweep the mid-term elections much as they did to Clinton in '94. The first item on their agenda is to kill health care reform, thereby embarassing the president on one of his fondest wishes. A couple of the more honest, or foolish, republicans have actually publicly admitted to this strategy. And so, opposition to health care reform is based on political strategy, not principled disagreement. The good of the party before the good of the country. At least the republicans are consistent.

Tomorrow evening I will be attending a town hall meeting in Hackensack, NJ hosted by democratic congressman Steve Rothman. The stories of paid organizers and chanting and yelling "dittoheads" are numerous enough that I don't have to review them here. I look forward to personally shaming the right wing activists who make the unfortunate mistake of attending this meeting for the sole purpose of disruption and discord. They're in for a big surprise. I will write about it in the near future. Thanks to anyone who might accidentally read this. Your support is greatly appreciated.

Paul Roth
Hackensack, NJ
8/13/09

Thursday, November 03, 2005

At long last, Forrester, have you no decency?

A similar group of words to this one was once directed at the late Senator Joseph McCarthy, as he chaired Senate Committee hearings which routinely destroyed lives and reputations. Today, I am directing these words to New Jersey Republican Gubernatorial candidate Doug Forrester, he richly deserves it.

In the last week, the Forrester campaign has begun broadcasting an ad which features his wife saying, "Doug never let his family down and he won't let New Jersey down either". It sounds harmless enough until you understand that the underlying message here refers to his opponent, Democratic US Senator Jon Corzine, and his divorced marital status. Forrester is not only so pathetic as to stoop this low but he is also cowardly enough to put these words into the mouth of his own wife, rather than do it himself.

Worsening this sick controversy was a comment later made by Sen. Corzine's ex-wife to the New York Times in which she essentially stated that she had seen the commercial and yes, in fact, she believed Corzine would let New Jersey down, just as he had her. Although Corzine's ex-wife is certainly entitled to her opinion and divorces aren't always congenial, the political overtone within her comment sounds awfully fishy. The entire chain of events literally stinks of a far, far too convenient coincidence.

With less than a week until the election, Forrester has found himself trailing badly in the polls. If nothing were to shake up the race dramatically, and soon, he would lose his second statewide election in less than four years and his career in Garden State politics would probably be over. Is Doug Forrester willing to exploit not only his opponent's divorce and his own wife, but also engage Corzine's bitter ex-wife in a last chance effort to save his career? I hope not. As I said before, though, the whole thing seems just a little too convenient, for Doug Forrester anyway.

On Primary day back in June, I happened to meet a Forrester volunteer who was out putting up lawn signs on public property. When I told her that I thought her guy was going to win that evening but would have little chance against Corzine, she immediately fired back that they had plenty of "dirt" on Corzine and they were going to "get him". Little wonder then that this has become the entire theme of the Forrester campaign. As far as I'm concerned, any New Jersey voter who walks into a polling place next Tuesday intending to pull the lever for Mr. Forrester, will have to check their humanity at the door first.

Paul Roth, Jr.

Tuesday, October 25, 2005

Wanna be Vice President? Send resumes now.

For over two years I have been telling my friends that, if George W. Bush won re-election in 2004 (at that time), Dick Cheney would never serve out the full second term as Vice President. Why not? Because it doesn't benefit the Republicans politically and that's all that matters in this White House. Were Cheney to remain, as someone who obviously will not seek the White House himself in 2008, it would force every prospective GOP candidate to begin running for president from scratch and without a national stage.

Today we find out from the New York Times that soon to be indicted Cheney's Chief of Staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, actually learned the identity of a covert CIA agent from his boss over a month before her identity ever became public. This is the proverbial "other shoe" I have been waiting to see "drop". This according to Libby's own notes, which are now in the possession of the Prosecutor. Of course, this does not amount to a crime by itself. However, it does mean two very important things. The first is that it indicates that the prosecutor probably intends to go after Libby for Perjury and possibly Obstruction. Libby testified to the prosecutor that he first learned Valerie Plame's identity from a journalist.

The second important thing this new information establishes is the level of desire on the part of this administration to attack anyone who criticized its Iraq policy. It shows that the highest level people in the White House were exploring how to discredit and possibly intimidate former ambassador Joseph Wilson, Plame's Husband and an Iraq War critic, even before he wrote his New York Times editorial column entitled, "What I didn't find in Africa". This White House is surpassing even the Nixon administration in terms of how it deals with political opponents.

This revelation also constitutes an opportunity for the administration. Although Cheney will most likely not be indicted in the matter, Bush did say early on that he would fire "anyone involved" in the leak case. Though he has since flip-flopped on this and changed it to "anyone convicted of a crime". Once indictments are handed down, by the end of this week, this will become the hottest political story in America. The level to which Cheney's name will now be directly involved in this scandal, on a daily basis, will be the perfect opportunity for him to step down gracefully, possibly citing his well known health problems.This would allow Bush to choose the individual he most wants to replace him in the Oval Office in January 2009. With the White House in complete turmoil and his job approval numbers plummeting, a fresh start and chance to leave his mark in the Oval Office should be very appealing to Bush.

Now we can get on with the specualation. Just who will Bush pick? Right now, if I had to guess, I would narrow it down to Virginia's George Allen or Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum, both of whom appear to be running for the office already. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, also eyeing the job, has opposed the president's stubborness on Stem Cell research. This will probably kill him with the Christian fundamentalists, a necessary constituency in order to win the Republican nomination. Sen. John McCain has been critical of Bush in the past and also could never garner the religious right's support.

In the post Harriet Miers era,the Supreme Court nominee will likely withdraw herself before she ever gets to the confirmation hearings, Bush will have to be very careful on the "Crony" issue. This all but eliminates speculations about Condoleezza Rice, Bush's brother Jeb from Florida or any one of a number of surprise possibilities within the administration. Dark horses would probably be Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas or Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, both of whom would be very acceptable to the president's born again Christian base, as Miers was not. Any one of a number of Republican Governors could also qualify as a dark horse candidate as well, perhaps from a key electoral state?

No matter who ends up occupying the VP position, Mr. Cheney will not simply disappear. He will still be very active in the administration and its policy making, in an unofficial capacity though. Just remember that I said this now and remember my most likely picks. I've been saying this privately for a long time, as my friends can attest. I'm going to look like a genius!

Paul Roth, Jr.

Wednesday, October 05, 2005

A New Letter to the Editor

The following letter was printed today in the Record newspaper. However, it was edited. This is my unedited version:

In an 1802 letter to the Danbury Baptist Association, President Thomas Jefferson wrote, “Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith and worship… I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion… thus building a wall of separation between church and state.” Our Congressman disagrees. Well, Scott Garrett, you’re no Tom Jefferson.

Rep.Garrett claims that acceptance of the Intelligent Design theory is “growing in scientific communities and academia.” This is an outright lie. ID has gained acceptance only among the right wing religious zealots in America who cannot stand our constitutional separation of church and state. A theory must offer evidence to be considered acceptable. ID offers none. ID is a matter of faith and as Jefferson pointed out, matters of faith are best left to the individual, the family and the church, not the government. Do you want your school board making decisions affecting your child’s religious beliefs?

Due to my work last year, I had to learn a great deal more about Scott Garrett than most of his constituents know. I know him to be a right wing “Christian” who prefers moving toward Theocratic government. I strongly suggest that the 58% of my neighbors who voted for Garrett last fall do some more research on him. You’ll be shocked by what you find.

Wednesday, September 14, 2005

Yet another good letter which the North Jersey Media Group has ignored

Garrett Must Go

Regarding Mr. Fallon’s Sept. 10th article on Scott Garrett http://http://www.bergen.com/page.php?qstr=eXJpcnk3ZjcxN2Y3dnFlZUVFeXkyJmZnYmVsN2Y3dnFlZUVFeXk2NzY2NzIw; Congressman Garrett is one of the most radical right-wingers in the US Congress. Garrett is only a fiscal conservative when it comes to matters of human need, as you rightly pointed out. When it comes to war spending and tax cuts for the super wealthy he is as liberal as the day is long. He has approved over One Trillion Dollars in deficit spending in just three years.

He is part of a far right-wing ideological movement in this country which, while winning elections, has proven itself incapable of running our government in either foreign or domestic matters. When ideology matters more than results, America is heading in the wrong direction.

Garrett is a darling of the radical right-wing Christian crazies such as Robertson, Falwell and Schlaffly. He receives large contributions from Schlaffly’s Eagle Forum, the ultra-conservative “Club for Growth” and various militant anti-abortion groups. When Louisiana Congressman Richard Baker recently commented on the devastation of Hurricane Katrina by saying, “We finally cleaned up public housing in New Orleans. We couldn’t do it, but God did”, believe that he was echoing Garrett’s feelings on an issue like public housing. Garrett, though, is too savvy to say that kind of thing out loud. He also sports the worst environmental voting record of any politician in American history!

Whether in the Republican primary or in next November’s Mid-Term Election, we’ll have the opportunity to rid ourselves of Garrett’s radical brand of representation and replace him with a moderate who shares our values and our desire for results, not hard line ideology.

Paul Roth, Jr.
River Edge, NJ

Monday, August 29, 2005

A Failed President and a Failed Movement

This is less a column and more of a symbolic funeral. It is a funeral for the failed right wing movement and their failed President. That is not to say that the right wing movement has not been successful. They have taken over the courts, the news media, dominated the White House and for the last twelve years they have held control of the Congress. All of these, though, are only political successes. At the same time they have, at every turn, proved themselves completely incapable of governing this country and especially running it's foreign policy.

The current Presidential approval rating of 36%, according to a recent American Research Group poll, when combined with an even lower national approval of Congress, shows that Americans now see just how far out of the mainstream the Republican leadership of this country is. They also see very clearly that they have been lied to repeatedly when it comes to the most crucial issues we face.

In 2008, Republicans will have run our federal government for twenty of the last twenty-eight years and twenty-eight of the last forty. They have stacked our courts with right wingers, cut taxes for the wealthiest while raising the burden for the rest of us, limited free speech, broken down the separation of church and state, built up mountains of deficit spending which we may never get out from under and run militaristic foreign policies which first support such enemies as Saddam Hussein and later used him as a scapegoat for further war.

Their 1980's Middle East policy was disgraceful. First they cut and ran when attacked in Lebanon. Then they played both sides of the fence illegally in the Iraq/Iran war. Meanwhile they literally created Osama Bin Ladin by funding his Pan-Islamic movement's war in Afghanistan. Bin Ladin proved to himself that he could bring a superpower to it's knees and now he wants to do it again, to America.

On the domestic front they have fared no better. While the economy performed well for a few years in the 80's, the real deficit spending also began. As the 80's turned into the 90's, the economy again suffered and the deficits spun out of control. When a Democrat entered the White House in 1993, he inherited a domestic mess so severe that most wondered if he could make any real difference. Eight years later, when he left office, our budgets were in surplus, our economy had grown more than in any modern period, small businesses were booming all over America, fewer people went without health care, a more comfortable middle class was growing for the first time in four decades, we were largely at peace throughout the world and more Americans were optimistic about the new century than ever before. In 2001, however, the movement right wing took complete control of the federal government for the first time.

This indeed marked the first time that the ideological right wing "movement" conservatives really held all the cards. Many prior Republican leaders had been of the older guard and less gung ho about the radical right wing. The GOP was now the party of DeLay, Brownback, Santorum, Frist and George W. Bush and they held all the power. Foreign policy would be in the hands of global military dominationists from the Project for The New American Century, such as Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Wolfowitz, Perle and Bolton, who all came to their new jobs foaming at the mouth to re-invade Iraq. America would clearly not be at peace much longer.

The glaring ommision in the new national security/defense strategy? No priority given to global terrorism whatsoever. So when global terrorism found us on 9/11/01, it simply became time to blame the Democrat who had left office eight months earlier and whose administration had prevented several attacks on our shores during the late 90's AND first made Osama Bin Ladin a wanted man internationally.

9/11 also gave the failed movementeers an opportunity to justify the Iraqi invasion they had so desperately craved during those eight long years out of power. There were just two obstacles. The first was the clear evidence that Osama Bin Ladin and Al-Qaeda were responsible for 9/11 and that they were being sheltered by the Taliban government in Afghanistan. Which meant that a half-hearted military operation in that country must supercede Iraqi invasion in order to maintain public credibility. The second and bigger obstacle was the truth. The truth was that although Saddam Hussein had been a terrible tyrant, he had been largely under our control since the first Gulf War (as both Condoleeza Rice and former Secretary of State Colin Powell had publicly stated in 2001), that there was only questionable evidence of Iraqi WMD programs at best and that Hussein's government had no links to Al-Qaeda.

The solution for the second obstacle was the biggest and most dishonest public relations campaign in American history. In September 2002, our failed movement President, his failed cabinet and the right wing media began an incredible PR push to link Iraq with 9/11 where there was no evidence, convince Americans that Saddam was resisting inspections and paint Iraq as a nation on the verge of selling nuclear and biological weapons to terrorists. At one point, one could actually watch the failed ideological movement President on TV saying that Saddam would not let inspectors do their job and split screen live footage of Saddam's Al-Samuud missiles being destroyed by those very inspectors. As they say, "The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it". The problem is that we wanted to believe it. Americans had hated Hussein for over a decade. It was an easy message to digest. It was also, unfortunately, a pack of lies. War based on lies is never "a noble cause".

The end results of the Iraqi invasion have acted as the smell of fresh brewed coffee and sound of sizzling bacon Americans needed to wake them from their dreamlike trance. We now see an Iraq on the verge of two outcomes, civil war, an Islamic state or both. Civil war would keep our military mired there in a hornet's nest worse than the one which already exists. A Shiite dominated Islamic state would naturally align itself with the Shiite dominated Iran and create a far more formidable enemy than Saddam Hussein ever was. An Islamic state in Iraq would also continue to be the kind of breeding and training ground for anti-American terrorists it has now become. All of these outcomes share one common idea, they couldn't be more beautiful to Osama Bin Ladin and the leaders of Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups.

The failed movement President and his failed neocon ideological foreign policy team have handed Bin Ladin his greatest wish, another Islamic state in the Middle East and one that will soon align with other terrorist sponsors. America's enemy number one couldn't possibly be any more pleased. For this our sons and daughters have died in the desert. Unlike in the Vietnam era, however, the troops are not being held to blame or hated, even by the most vocal opponents of the Iraq war. That awful experience has shown Americans that our soldiers simply do the job which they are sent to do. They are surely not to blame. Instead it is the leaders who send them so eagerly who must answer for their actions. This is truly a failed President, a failed foreign policy team, a failure in the war against terrorism and a tragic blow to America's standing in the world. A failed right wing movement indeed.

On the domestic side the failed right wing movement again did what they always do, thay cut taxes on wealth while turning a blind eye toward the working poor, lower and middle classes. This did not work because it never works. Unless the American economy is broadening as it grows it will always be doomed to sluggish behavior at best. Unless more and more people are contributing to our economic growth the economy is not truly expanding, money is simply shifting upward to those who already have lots of it. This is exactly the kind of economy the failed movement right wingers want anyway. So they are perfectly happy with it. The rest of us must tread water in an economic riptide which will eventually pull us under.

Trillions in tax cuts for the wealthiest have had yet another bad effect for America. They have ripped a gaping hole in our once desirable budget situation. We have slid from a $250 Billion budget surplus back into the black hole of $500 Billion deficits in just a few years time. Our total debt now nears $9 Trillion. No, 9/11 and the Iraq war are not the chief causes, although they haven't helped any. Five million more Americans have no health insurance in the last few years. More abortions have been performed in this country every year under our failed movement President and failed Congress. Every year under the Democrat, the number declined. The failed movement President's education programs still remain unfunded which sends property taxes up. Meanwhile too many of our children are still not receiving the best education possible. The failed movement President's energy policy has offered Americans only unconstitutional secrecy, rolling blackouts, higher bills, tax cuts for already massively profitable corporations (more than 60% of which pay zero income taxes, driving our taxes higher) and $3.00 plus prices for a gallon of gas. Those gas prices now threaten to jolt our economy back into recession in the near future.

In 1994, Newt Gingrich told America that if we gave his party control of the Congress they would enact sweeping changes which would restore our government's openness and make us proud of the institution once again. Twelve years later, what we have instead is the most corrupt US House in modern history. It is a bizarre story with all the aspects of the allegorical "Animal Farm". Yes, the pigs have indeed become the men, only far, far worse.

K Street lobbyists pour in and out of Congress at an historic rate. Corporations pony up for legislation under failed and corrupt Majority Leader DeLay as though they were customers at a Deli counter. Ethics rules are a thing of the past as the movement leadership has tied up the Committee meant to oversee such matters. The voices of the Minority are regularly silenced as are any ammendments they offer. Voice votes which clearly favor a Minority position are ruled as being the opposite. Process is often used as a weapon to keep the Minority from influencing or even understanding the legislation which they are voting on.

Laws which are unconstitutional regularly pass this failed movement US House, in Bill form, until perhaps the courts finds them to be such a violation. Even worse, this failed movement Congress shows no desire to fill it's constitutional role as a check upon our failed movement President's administration. Meanwhile the failed movement Congress does everything it can to undermine the power of the judicial branch, which is not ideologically "movement" enough for them.

Our government is now the most secretive government in American history. The ordinary American no longer has any voice, not when an ideological movement is at work. The recent Terri Schiavo affair proved to this country that the failed movement Congress is only interested in pleasing their political base and advancing their narrow agenda, not in representing all of the people as our founders intended.

In a recent poll, just 19% of Americans said that this failed movement Congress shares their agenda and is pursuing the right path for this country. This number speaks volumes about the failure of the right wing movement. As does our failed movement President's 36% approval rating. Further proof of the death of the right wing movement comes from the right wing itself. When such a well-heeled and dedicated right winger as Pat Buchanan is writing books with titles like "How the Right Went Wrong" and moderate Republicans such as our former Governor and Bush EPA Head Christie Todd Whitman pen tomes entitled "It's My Party Too", you know there's trouble in the right wing ideological paradise. It literally stinks of failure. As elected Republicans around the country rapidly jump off the Social Security and Iraq war bandwagons, Democrats are showing signs of pulling together in order to offer the American people a real and lasting alternative to the movement right wing's ideological fanaticism.

The Democrats have a tremendous opportunity in 2006 and 2008. The failed right wing movement and it's failed President have indeed failed miserably to deliver on any promise or "contract" it has made with the American people. It is not just a political opportunity, however, but also a tremendous responsibility. Americans do not want an ideological left wing movement to replace the failed ideological right wing one. America needs instead to protect it's democracy, to expand and not retract civil rights, to protect it's homeland and make the world a safer place. We need all of this and more while growing our economy and making the American dream available to more Americans all the time. A Democrat, against heavy odds, acheived these lofty goals not too long ago. The failed right wing movement and our failed movement President have failed miserably on every single count. A failure as President and a failure of radical right wing ideology.

Real governance means allowing and not stifling opposition, not calling it treason. Real governance means open government that seeks to represent all Americans, not just a radical few. Real governance also means a President who will listen not only to those who agree with him but more importantly to those who don't, because they are Americans too. Real governance ultimately means that the President, Senators and Representatives all must answer to the people for the actions they take, especially in time of war and never just on Election Day. If Democrats can succeed not only politically but more importantly in governance itself, where the ideological right wing has so badly failed, then the new century may yet hold the shining future for which we all hope.


The Failed Ideological Right Wing Movement is Dead, Long Live America.